4.7 Article

Abandoned agricultural land and its potential for short rotation woody crops in Latvia

Journal

LAND USE POLICY
Volume 49, Issue -, Pages 435-445

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.022

Keywords

Abandoned agricultural land; Renewable energy; Short rotation woody crops (SWRC); Qualitative methods; Latvia; Latgale

Funding

  1. State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry (SUNY-ESF)
  2. Latvian State Forest Research Institute Silava
  3. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) [2010/0268/2DP/2.1.1.1.0/10/APIA/VIAA/118]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Abandoned agricultural land in Latvia offers high potential for renewable energy production, especially for short rotation woody crops (SRWC). The objective of this study is to understand the main reasons why agricultural lands remain abandoned, and whether these reasons could pose any obstacles to the establishment of SRWC. The study was carried out in the Latgale planning region, with estimated 75,530 ha of abandoned agricultural land suitable for SRWC. Qualitative methods of data collection and analysis were used to study the phenomenon. The results show that the primary reason for agricultural land abandonment is the absentee landowners who do not reside in the municipality (e.g., heirs, urban dwellers, intermediaries, and/or investors). Other reasons are: (1) perception of a greater future value from other types of land use; (2) environmental and biophysical characteristics of the land; (3) policy obstacles; (4) social behavior; and, (5) financial and economic constraints. The study also reveals that the establishment of SRWC on abandoned agricultural lands will depend on policies guiding land acquisition and agricultural land use, as well as social and economic policies that encourage small holder production, especially in Latgale. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available