4.7 Article

Adsorptive treatment of coking wastewater using raw coal fly ash: Adsorption kinetic, thermodynamics and regeneration by Fenton process

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 210, Issue -, Pages 624-632

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.07.073

Keywords

Raw coal fly ash; Adsorption; Coking wastewater; Fenton regeneration

Funding

  1. National Students' training program for innovation and entrepreneurship in China [2018J00027]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Raw coal fly ash (RCFA) was used directly as adsorbent to treat coking wastewater. The results show that the dissolution of reductive components from RCFA, this can be avoided by washing (6 times) using distilled water. The concentration of leached metal elements in wastewater is lower than the standard in GB18918-2002, China. The adsorption process accords with the pseudo-second order adsorption kinetic model and Langmuir thermodynamics model better than other ones, and it belongs to a physical and exothermic process. More loading of RCFA (10-60 mg L-1) means less adsorption capacity, and 40 g L-1 is the optimal value. The variation of regeneration rate of SRCFA for the first time (RR1) with regeneration time accords with the behavior of hyperbolic function (1/RR1 = 0.986 + 53.913/t), and the [H2O2], [Fe2+] and regeneration tem- perature can affect the RR1 at the manner of exponential function (RR1 = e(-1.11/[H2O2)], RR1 = 1.077. e(-2467/Fe2+), and RR1 =2.064. e(-251.048/ T))at the optimal regeneration condition of SRCFA([H2O2] =5 mM, [Fe2+] =8 mM and temperature = 293 K), the RR 1 can reach 87.1% after 270 min. The stability of RCFA shows two different stages, i.e., within the first 4 regenerations the RR increases from 87.1% to 89.7% and then decreases gradually and always. This variation trend can be confirmed by the results of SEM and BET tests. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available