4.7 Article

A phenomenological reaction kinetic model for Cu removal from aqueous solutions by zero-valent iron (ZVI)

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 200, Issue -, Pages 542-553

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.02.127

Keywords

Zero-valent iron; Cu removal; Reaction kinetic modelling; Phenomenological model; Dynamic simulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Zero-valent iron (ZVI) being an inexpensive and eco-friendly catalyst has drawn great attention in removal of heavy metals from wastewaters. However, quantitative understandings of ZVI processes are significantly deficient. To compensate for the lack of quantitative analyses of removal of heavy metals by ZVI, a phenomenological reaction kinetic model was newly developed for removal of Cu chosen as a typical heavy metal from acidic aqueous solutions by ZVI. The novel kinetic model is based on the adsorption of Cu2+ and H+ onto ZVI surface and subsequent Cu2+ reduction on ZVI surface and Fe2+ elution from ZVI. Batch experiments were conducted to elucidate effects of pH and Cu loading on Cu removal by ZVI in acidic aqueous solutions and to validate the proposed phenomenological reaction kinetic model. The quick and complete removals of 1.57 mM Cu were established in the rage of pH 2-5. Although the maximum Cu removal rate was obtained at pH 4, effects of pH were insignificant. In the range of Cu loading from 0393 to 4.72 mM, almost complete Cu removals were obtained at pH 4 within 35 min. The changes in concentrations of Cu2+, Fe2+, H+ and dissolved oxygen were strongly linked with each other. They could be successfully simulated by the proposed model with the average correlation coefficient of 0.979. The capability of the phenomenological reaction kinetic model for dynamic simulation of Cu removal by ZVI under acidic conditions was confirmed. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available