4.7 Article

Bioavailability and toxicity of trace metals (Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, and Zn) in sediment cores from the Shima River, South China

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 192, Issue -, Pages 31-42

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.10.110

Keywords

Riverine sediment; Trace metal; Geochemical fraction; Toxic effects; Vibrio fischeri

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [41701585, 41611140112]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [17lgpy40]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong, China [2017A030310309]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Five sediment cores (S1-S5) were collected from the Shima River to determine the bioavailability of trace metals (Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, and Zn) using the modified European Community Bureau of Reference (BCR) procedure. The toxic effects of polluted sediment were assessed using the LUMISTox (R) bioassay with Vibrio fischeri and chemical models such as the toxicity unit (TU) of each metal, sum of all TUs (Sigma TU), and toxic risk index (TRI). The results showed that Cd, Ni, and Zn were present mainly in the acid-soluble and residual fractions, and the residual fraction of Cr accounted for the majority of the metal content (44%), while Cu was present mainly in the reducible and residual fractions. Cd had a mean enrichment factor (EF) of 15.1 and was considered to be severely enriched, while there was a minor enrichment of Cr and moderately severe enrichment of Zn, Cu, and Ni. From the LUMISTox (R) bioassay, an acute TU (TUa) value exceeding 0.4 was found at the upper and middle reach sites and was considered to represent slightly acute toxicity, whereas little acute toxicity was found at the lower reach site. The acid-soluble fraction of trace metals was the geochemical fraction mainly responsible for the acute toxicity of the sediment, and acid-soluble Zn and Ni were identified as important contributors to sediment toxicity. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available