4.7 Article

Assessment of reaction intermediates of gamma radiation-induced degradation of ofloxacin in aqueous solution

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 208, Issue -, Pages 606-613

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.06.003

Keywords

Ofloxacin; Gamma radiation; Degradation; Kinetics; Cytotoxicity

Funding

  1. Department of Atomic Energy (DAE)-Board of Research in Nuclear Sciences (BRNS), Government of India [35/14/48/BRNS-2014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gamma radiolytic degradation of an antibiotic, ofioxacin (OFX) was investigated under different experimental conditions. The parameters such as initial OFX concentration, solution pH, absorbed dose and the concentrations of inorganic (CO32-) and organic (t-BuOH) additives were optimized to achieve the efficient degradation of OFX. The degradation dose constant values of OFX were calculated as 2364, 1.159, 0.776 and 0.618 kGy(-1) for the initial OFX concentrations of 0.05, 0.1, 0.15 and 0.2 mM with their corresponding (G (-OFX)) values of 0.481, 0.684, 1.755 and 1.971, respectively. Degradation rate of OFX was significantly increased with increase in the absorbed dose and decrease in the initial OFX concentration under acidic condition when compared to neutral or alkaline condition. Reaction of OFX in the presence of CO32- and t-BuOH showed that the degradation was primarily caused by the reaction of OFX with radiolytically generated reactive hydroxyl radicals. Mineralization extent of OFX was determined in terms of percentage reduction in total organic carbon (TOC) and results revealed that the addition of H2O2 enhanced the mineralization of OFX from 29% to 36.1% with H2O2 dose of 0.5 mM at an absorbed dose of 3.0 kGy. Based on the LC-QTOF-MS analysis, gamma radiolytic degradation intermediates/products of OFX were identified and the possible degradation pathways of OFX were proposed. Cytotoxicity study of the irradiated OFX solutions showed that gamma radiation has potential to detoxify OFX. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available