4.5 Article

Hydrolyzed tilapia fish collagen induces osteogenic differentiation of human periodontal ligament cells

Journal

BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1748-6041/10/6/065020

Keywords

hydrolyzed fish collagen; periodontal ligament cells; osteogenic differentiation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31470917]
  2. Shanghai Sci-Tech Committee Foundation [15DZ2290100]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Alveolar bone regeneration has aroused worldwide attention and plays an important role in oral clinics. In recent years, the application of biomaterials to induce osteogenic differentiation of periodontal ligament cells has become the hot topic in the field of alveolar bone regeneration. At present, most existing biomaterials lack osteoinductivity, while extrinsic inducers carry the risk of unwanted side effects. The objective of this work was to study the in vitro functionality of a newly developed hydrolyzed tilapia fish collagen (HFC) for periodontal tissue regeneration. HFC was extracted from the scales of tilapia, human periodontal ligament cells (hPDL cells) were cultured with HFC without the addition of any inducing reagent, and the effects of HFC on cell viability and osteogenic differentiation were investigated. The results revealed that HFC promoted the cell viability of hPDL cells. Furthermore, the upregulation of osteogenic markers ALP, COL I, RUNX2, and OCN at the gene level and the production of osteogenic-related proteins (alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin) proved the success of osteogenic differentiation of hPDL cells treated with HFC. In addition, we revealed that the effect of HFC was mediated by ERK signaling pathways. Taken together, the data presented in this paper suggested for the first time that HFC is a promising bioactive ingredient for biomaterials used in alveolar bone regeneration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available