4.7 Article

Characterization of manganese oxidation by Brevibacillus at different ecological conditions

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 205, Issue -, Pages 553-558

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.04.130

Keywords

Biological manganese oxidation; Biogenic manganese oxides; Manganese-oxidizing bacteria; Isolation; Brevibacillus

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31470233]
  2. Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of Heilongjiang Province [JC201407]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment (Harbin Institute of Technology) [2016DX10]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [HIT.BRETIII. 201232]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bacterial Mn(II) oxidation plays an important role in the biogeochemical cycling of manganese and many trace metals. This study describes Mn(II) oxidation by two isolated manganese (Mn)-oxidizing strains that were identified and assigned as Brevibacillus brevis MO1 and Brevibacillus parabrevis MO2 based on physiochemical and phylogenetic characterizations. The ecological conditions influenced Mn(II) oxidation by both strains. Mn(II) stimulated the growth of strain MO2 while slightly inhibiting strain MO1. Mn(II)-oxidizing activity of two strains was enhanced with increase of initial pH, and maximum Mn(II)oxidizing activity occurred at pH 8 for both strains (93.5%-94.0%). Brevibacillus showed the capability of mesophilic and psychrophilic Mn(II) oxidation. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis indicated that the biogenic manganese oxides had an intermediate valence between 3 and 4. These results demonstrated that Brevibacillus, which is capable of oxidizing dissolved Mn(II), will be a suitable strain for exploring the mechanism of manganese oxidation in engineered and natural environments. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available