4.7 Article

Differences in the bioaccumulation of selenium by two earthworm species (Pheretima guillemi and Eisenia fetida)

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 202, Issue -, Pages 560-566

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.03.094

Keywords

bioaccumulation; Selenium; Earthworm; Pheretima guillemi; Eisenia fetida

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Major Project of Guangxi [AA17202026-4]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0502404]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences through its One-Hundred Talent Program [Y523101030]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Information on the bioaccumulation of selenium (Se) in soil invertebrates (e.g. earthworms) is rather scarce. In the present study, bioaccumulation of Se in two eco-physiologically different earthworms, namely anecic Pheretima guillemi and epigeic Eisenia fetida, was determined after 28 days exposure to a successive doses of Se-spiked soil, specifically 0.5, 5, 50, and 200 mu g Se g(-1) soil. The results showed that Se concentration in earthworms elevated with increasing exposure levels, and maximums were up to 54.6 and 83.0 mu g g(-1) dry weight in Pheretima guillemi and Eisenia fetida, respectively, after 4 weeks exposure to 200 mu g Se g(-1) soil. Exposure to Se caused significant inhibition on earthworm growth, with the fresh weight loss ranging from 8.9% to 80.5%. Bioaccumulation factors (BAFs), empirically-derived and non-steady state, ranged from 0.12 to 4.17 and generally declined at higher exposure levels. Moreover, BAFs of Pheretima guillemi were higher than those of Eisenia fetida in low-dose Se-spiked soils, but the opposite was true in high-dose soils, indicating there is a species-specific response to exposure of Se between different earthworms. Further research is thus needed to reveal the accumulation pattern of Se in a wider range of earthworm species other than Eisenia fetida, which allows a better risk assessment of excessive Se to soil invertebrates and higher order organisms. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available