4.7 Article

Effects of salinity and COD/N on denitrification and bacterial community in dicyclic-type electrode based biofilm reactor

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 192, Issue -, Pages 328-336

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.10.108

Keywords

Municipal wastewater; Denitrification; Biofilm electrode reactor (BER); Salinity; Bacterial community

Funding

  1. National Key Technology Research and Development Program (China) [2015BAL04B03]
  2. Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment (China) [2015ZX07203-011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A dicyclic-type electrode based biofilm electrode reactor (BER) was developed for advanced nitrate removal from saline municipal wastewater. The denitrification efficiency was evaluated with a synthetic feed (NO3--N, 20 mg L-1) under different salinity and COD to nitrogen ratios (COD/N). As the salinity increased from 0% to 1.0%, the denitrification performance of both the traditional biofilm reactor (BR) and BER was inhibited; however, the BER showed better adaptation and ability to recover. The BER achieved a high nitrate removal efficiency (>= 90%) at a salinity of 1.0% and a low COD/N of 2.5 (theoretical stoichiometric 2.86 ignoring microbial growth). The abundance of Methylotenera mobilis in BR and Clostridium sticklandii in BER was higher than in the initial sludge sample used as inoculum. Likewise, the abundance of napA, nirS and nosZ genes increased as the COD/N further decreased. Under high salinity stress, the BER had a higher denitrification efficiency and the consumption of the organic carbon source (i.e., methanol) was reduced compared to BR. The cooperation between heterotrophic and autotrophic denitrifiers in the BER system provides a more efficient and feasible solution for nitrate removal from saline municipal wastewater. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available