4.6 Article

Flexible Fe2O3 and V2O5 Nanofibers as Binder-Free Electrodes for High-Performance All-Solid-State Asymmetric Supercapacitors

Journal

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
Volume 24, Issue 42, Pages 10683-10688

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201800461

Keywords

electrospinning; energy density; mesoporous materials; nanostructures; supercapacitors

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21471041]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China [QC2017007]
  3. University Nursing Program for Young Scholars with Creative Talents in Heilongjiang Province [UN-PYSCT-2017181]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flexible, highly porous Fe2O3 and V2O5 nanofibers (NFs) have been synthesized by a facile electrospinning method followed by calcination. They have been directly used as binder-free electrodes for high-performance supercapacitors. These Fe2O3 and V2O5 NFs interconnect with one another and construct three-dimensional hierarchical porous films with high specific surface areas. Benefitting from their unique structural features, binder-free Fe2O3 and V2O5 porous nanofiber electrodes offer high specific capacitances of 255Fg(-1) and 256Fg(-1), respectively, at 2mVs(-1) in 1m aqueous Na2SO4 as electrolyte. An all-solid-state asymmetric supercapacitor (ASC) has been fabricated using Fe2O3 and V2O5 nanofibers as negative and positive electrodes, respectively. It could be operated at up to 1.8V, taking advantage of the wide and opposite potential windows of the respective electrodes. The assembled all-solid-state ASC achieved a high energy density up to 32.2Whkg(-1) at an average power density of 128.7Wkg(-1), and exhibited excellent cycling stability and power capability. The effective and facile synthesis method and superior electrochemical performance described herein make electrospun Fe2O3 and V2O5 NFs promising electrode materials for high-performance ASCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available