4.5 Article

Effects of tannic acid on performance and fatty acid composition of breast muscle in broiler chickens under heat stress

Journal

ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.4081/ijas.2015.3956

Keywords

Heat stress; Tannic acid; Performance; Fatty acid profile; Broiler

Funding

  1. LRGS Fasa by the Ministry of Education Malaysia [1/2012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One hundred twenty day-old broiler chicks (Cobb 500) were randomly assigned into 4 treatment groups to investigate the effects of tannic acid supplementation (TA) on fatty acid composition in breast muscle of broilers under chronic heat exposure conditions. Five pen replicates of 6 chicks each were assigned to each of the following 4 dietary treatments: i) basal diet containing no TA at 25 degrees C (CL); ii) basal diet containing no TA at 35 degrees C (CH); iii) basal diet supplemented with 1% TA at 25 degrees C (TL); and iv) basal diet supplemented with 1% TA at 35 degrees C (TH). At the end of the 5-week experiment, breast muscle samples were collected to examine the fatty acid composition. Results showed that temperature, TA and their interaction effect significantly decreased body weight gain and feed intake. In addition, feed conversion ratio (FCR) significantly increased under high temperature, and addition of TA under high temperature did not improve the FCR. The effects of temperature, TA and their interaction on the saturated and unsaturated fatty acids were not significant (P>0.05). However, monounsaturated fatty acids significantly reduced by adding TA to the diet. Generally, TA improved the fatty acid profile of breast muscle of broilers under heat stress in comparison to the heat stressed chickens, which did not receive TA. Hence, it seems that dietary TA supplementation can be applied as a biological antioxidant for poultry nutrition in hot climatic conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available