4.8 Article

Direct Observation of Chemical Conversion from Fe3O4 to ε-Fe2O3 by a Nanosize Wet Process

Journal

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
Volume 30, Issue 9, Pages 2888-2894

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03708

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. JSPS [15H05697, 2903, 17H06367]
  2. Shitagau Noguchi Foundation
  3. MEXT
  4. JSPS
  5. JSPS KAKENHI [JP16H06521]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

epsilon-iron oxide (epsilon-Fe2O3) has drawn attention from the viewpoints of high-density magnetic recording and high-frequency millimeter wave absorption. To date, chemical conversion from Fe2O3 (magnetite) to epsilon-Fe2O3 under wet process conditions have been difficult. Herein, we report that epsilon-Fe2O3 could be obtained from Fe2O3 using a nanosize wet process. In the present method, 10 or 16 nm sized Fe2O3 nanocrystals are used as the precursor. Fe2O3 nanocrystals are embedded in a silica matrix and subsequently sintered around 1000 degrees C in air, resulting in the chemical conversion from Fe2O3 to epsilon-Fe2O3 being confirmed. In the case of 10 nm sized Fe2O3 precursors, the sample consists of 16% epsilon-Fe2O3 and 84% gamma-Fe2O3, whereas in the case of 16 nm sized Fe2O3 precursors, the sample consists of 24% epsilon-Fe2O3 and 76% gamma-Fe2O3. The magnetic hysteresis loops of the samples are theoretically predicted using the large hysteresis loop of epsilon-Fe2O3 and the magnetization curve of super-paramagnetic gamma-Fe2O3. The experimental and predicted hysteresis loops agree well. First-principles calculations suggest that Fe3O4 nanocrystals between 8 and 43 nm transform directly to epsilon-Fe2O3. Due to the strict size condition, the chemical conversion from Fe2O3 to epsilon-Fe2O3 is the first to be observed by a wet process. The nanosize wet process from Fe2O3 to epsilon-Fe2O3 should accelerate the development of highly functional hard magnetic ferrite epsilon-Fe2O3.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available