4.0 Article

Optimized method for determination of 16 FDA polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in mainstream cigarette smoke by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

Journal

CHEMISTRY CENTRAL JOURNAL
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGEROPEN
DOI: 10.1186/s13065-018-0397-2

Keywords

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs); Mainstream cigarette smoke; Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry; High resolution mass spectrometry; Low resolution mass spectrometry; Accelerated solvent extraction

Funding

  1. British American Tobacco

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) method was validated for the determination of 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from the FDA list of 93 harmful or potentially harmful constituents of mainstream cigarette smoke (MCS). Target analytes were extracted from total particulate matter using accelerated solvent extraction with a toluene/ethanol solvent mixture. Matrix artefacts were removed by two-step solid-phase extraction process. Three different GC-MS systems [GC-MS (single quadrupole), GC-MS/MS (triple quadrupole) and GC-HRMS (high resolution, magnetic sector)] using the same separation conditions were compared for the analysis of MCS of 3R4F Kentucky reference cigarettes generated under ISO and intense smoking regimes. The high mass resolution (m/Delta m >= 10,000) and associated selectivity of detection by GC-HRMS provided the highest quality data for the target PAHs in MCS. Owing to the HR data acquisition mode enabling measurement of accurate mass, limits of quantification for PAHs were 5 to 15-fold lower for GC-HRMS than for GC-MS/MS and GC-MS. The presented study illustrates that the optimised sample preparation strategy followed by GC-HRMS analysis provides a fit-for-purpose and robust analytical approach allowing measurement of PAHs at (ultra) low concentrations in MCS. Furthermore, the study illustrates the importance and benefits of robust sample preparation and clean-up to compensate for limited selectivity when low-resolution MS is used.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available