4.8 Review

Organic semiconductor crystals

Journal

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages 422-500

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7cs00490g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National 1000-Talents Program
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [HUST: 2017KFYXJJ023, HUST: 2017KFXKJC002]
  3. Wuhan Science and Technology Bureau [2017010201010141]
  4. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2016YFB04001100, 2014CB643600, 2013CB933403, 2013CB933500]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51773071, 91233205, 91222203, 51303185]
  6. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB12030300]
  7. Beijing NOVA Programme [Z131101000413038]
  8. Beijing Local College Innovation Team Improve Plan [IDHT20140512]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Organic semiconductors have attracted a lot of attention since the discovery of highly doped conductive polymers, due to the potential application in field-effect transistors (OFETs), light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) and photovoltaic cells (OPVs). Single crystals of organic semiconductors are particularly intriguing because they are free of grain boundaries and have long-range periodic order as well as minimal traps and defects. Hence, organic semiconductor crystals provide a powerful tool for revealing the intrinsic properties, examining the structure-property relationships, demonstrating the important factors for high performance devices and uncovering fundamental physics in organic semiconductors. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the molecular packing, morphology and charge transport features of organic semiconductor crystals, the control of crystallization for achieving high quality crystals and the device physics in the three main applications. We hope that this comprehensive summary can give a clear picture of the state-of-art status and guide future work in this area.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available