4.8 Review

Development of endogenous enzyme-responsive nanomaterials for theranostics

Journal

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
Volume 47, Issue 15, Pages 5554-5573

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7cs00663b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Shenzhen University
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31771036, 51703132, 51573096]
  3. Basic Research Program of Shenzhen [JCYJ20170412111100742, JCYJ20160422091238319]
  4. Fok Ying-Tong Education Foundation for Young Teachers in the Higher Education Institutions of China [161032]
  5. China Post-doctoral Science Foundation [2018M633104]
  6. Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health
  7. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING [ZIAEB000073] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development of stimuli-responsive nanomaterials provides great potential for accurate diagnosis, effective treatment and precision theranostics. Among the sources of endogenous stimuli (e.g. enzymes, pH, redox, hypoxia, etc.) and exogenous stimuli (e.g. temperature, light, magnetic field, ultrasound, light, etc.), enzymes with intrinsic merits such as high relevance for numerous diseases, specific substrate selectivity and high catalytic efficiency have been widely employed for the design of responsive materials. The catalytic mechanisms mainly include the reduction/oxidation of substrates and the formation/cleavage of chemical bonds. So far, many enzymes such as proteases, phosphatases, kinases and oxidoreductases have been used in stimuli-responsive nanomaterials for theranostics. This tutorial review summarizes the recent progress in endogenous enzyme-responsive nanomaterials based on different building blocks such as polymers, liposomes, small organic molecules, or inorganic/organic hybrid materials; their design principles are also elaborated. In the end, the challenges and prospects of enzyme-responsive biomaterials-based theranostics are also discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available