4.8 Review

Modern Approaches for Asymmetric Construction of Carbon-Fluorine Quaternary Stereogenic Centers: Synthetic Challenges and Pharmaceutical Needs

Journal

CHEMICAL REVIEWS
Volume 118, Issue 7, Pages 3887-3964

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00778

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21761132021]
  2. National Institute of Health [R35 GM118190]
  3. IKERBASQUE
  4. Basque Foundation for Science
  5. JSPS KAKENHI in the Middle Molecular Strategy [JP16H01142]
  6. JSPS KAKENHI in Precisely Designed Catalysts with Customized Scaffolding [JP16H01017]
  7. Advanced Catalytic Transformation (ACT-C) from the JST
  8. Asahi Glass Foundation
  9. RIKEN
  10. JST
  11. JSPS
  12. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/100433/2014]
  13. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/100433/2014] Funding Source: FCT
  14. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H01017, 16H01142] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

New methods for preparation of tailor-made fluorine-containing compounds are in extremely high demand in nearly every sector of chemical industry. The asymmetric construction of quaternary C-F stereogenic centers is the most synthetically challenging and, consequently, the least developed area of research. As a reflection of this apparent methodological deficit, pharmaceutical drugs featuring C-F stereogenic centers constitute less than 1% of all fluorine-containing medicines currently on the market or in clinical development. Here we provide a comprehensive review of current research activity in this area, including such general directions as asymmetric electrophilic fluorination via organocatalytic and transition-metal catalyzed reactions, asymmetric elaboration of fluorine-containing substrates via alkylations, Mannich, Michael, and aldol additions, cross-coupling reactions, and biocatalytic approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available