4.3 Article

The clinical profile of employees with mental health problems working in social firms in the UK

Journal

JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 242-248

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3109/09638237.2015.1057324

Keywords

Employment; mental illness; social firms

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) [PB-PG-0609-19079]
  2. Research for Patient Benefit Programme
  3. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [PB-PG-0609-19079] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: UK social firms are under-researched but are a potentially important vocational option for people with mental health problems.Aims: To describe the clinical profile, satisfaction levels and experiences of social firms employees with mental health problems.Method: Clinical, work and service use characteristics were collected from social firms' employees with mental health problems in England and Wales. Workplace experience and satisfaction were explored qualitatively.Results: Predominantly, social firms' employees (N=80) report that they have a diagnosis of depression (56%) and anxiety (41%). People with schizophrenia (20%) or bipolar disorder (5%) were a minority. Respondents had low symptom and disability levels, high quality of life and job satisfaction and experienced reductions in secondary mental health service use over time. High-workplace satisfaction was related to flexibility, manager and colleague support and workplace accommodations.Conclusions: The clinical profile, quality of life and job satisfaction level of employees with mental health problems suggest social firms could be a useful addition to UK vocational services for some people. Current employees mainly have common mental disorders, and social firms will need to shift their focus if they are to form a substantial pathway for the vocational recovery of people currently using community mental health teams.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available