4.6 Article

Modeling of a CO2-piperazine-membrane absorption system

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN
Volume 131, Issue -, Pages 375-384

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2017.11.024

Keywords

CFD; CO2 absorption; Hollow fiber membrane; Piperazine; Modeling; Parametric study

Funding

  1. Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Low-grade Energy Utilization Technologies and Systems, China, Ministry of Education of China [LLEUTS-201708]
  2. Scientific Research Fund of Chongqing University of Technology, China [2016ZD07]
  3. Open Fund of Fujian Province University Key Laboratory of Green Energy and Environment Catalysis, China [FJ-GEEC201702]
  4. Open Fund of Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Featured Materials in Biochemical Industry, China [FJKL_FMBI201704]
  5. Scientific and Technological Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission, China [KJ1709193]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CO2 is a main greenhouse gas emission causing global warming and other environmental issues, which is mainly emitted from the fossil fuels combustion or utilization. Membrane absorption is a novel CO2 capture method that combines the advantages of chemical absorption and membrane separation. In this paper, a comprehensive 2D symmetric model for a CO2-piperazine (PZ)-membrane absorption process was proposed. PZ solutions showed high CO2 capture performance due to high chemical reaction rate constant. Decreasing the gas flowrate and increasing the absorbent flowrate promoted the CO2 absorption efficiency. On the other hand, varying the membrane contactor properties could also affect the capture of CO2. 0.28 m/s gas velocity, 0.08 m/s absorbent velocity, 20% CO2 in gas mixture, and 0.94 mol/L PZ were recommended as the optimum conditions after the parametric study. This numerical model is reliable for potential use in CO2-absorbent-membrane absorption systems. (C) 2017 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available