4.7 Article

Development of 3D-printed polymer-zeolite composite monoliths for gas separation

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 348, Issue -, Pages 109-116

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.178

Keywords

Composite monoliths; Phase separation; Torlon polymer; Zeolite; 3D printing; CO2 capture

Funding

  1. NASA-EPSCoR [NNX15AK38A]
  2. NASA [NNX15AK38A, 808084] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Organic-inorganic materials have emerged as promising candidates for use in various gas separation processes due to the beneficial synergistic effect of both constituents. Herein, we report a novel and facile approach for fabrication of composite monoliths consisting of Torlon polymer and 13X and 5A zeolites via 3D printing technique for the removal of CO2 from flue gas. The physical and structural properties of 3D-printed composite monoliths were systematically evaluated and compared with their pristine powders. The formation of monoliths was facilitated through nonsolvent-induced phase separation technique. By the incorporation of similar to 31 wt% zeolite particles into the polymer matrix, the obtained monoliths displayed CO2 capture capacities proportional to the zeolite loading. Most importantly, both 3D-printed Torlon-zeolite monoliths exhibited high compressive strengths of approximately 210 MPa, which was significantly higher than that of 3D-printed zeolite monoliths developed in our previous work. These results demonstrate the superiority of polymer-zeolite composite monoliths, formulated by 3D printing technique as robust structures with outstanding mechanical integrity and comparable adsorption capacity for various adsorption-based gas separation processes. The printing strategy reported herein can be easily extended to other organic-inorganic composite materials with different polymers and inorganic particles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available