4.7 Article

Interactive effect of electrode potential on pollutants conversion in denitrifying sulfide removal microbial fuel cells

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 339, Issue -, Pages 442-449

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.01.114

Keywords

Microbial fuel cell; Sulfide removal; Nitrate removal; Potential; External resistance

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21577108]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WUT 2017III023]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The denitrifying sulfide removal microbial fuel cell (MFC) provided an approach for treatment of wastewater containing both sulfide and nitrogenous compounds, but the production of sulfate and nitrite need to be prevented. The interactive effect of electrode potential on sulfide and nitrate conversion was investigated using potentiostatic three-chamber MFC. Both abiotic and biotic processes involved in anodic sulfate formation. Rising anode potential led to an increase of sulfide removal rate and a decrease of sulfur formation percent. The suitable anode potential favoring both sulfide removal and sulfur recovery ranged from -188 mV to -146 mV. The nitrate removal rate and gaseous nitrogen formation percent showed an increase followed by a decrease along with the rise of cathode potential. The suitable cathode potential favoring both nitrate removal and gaseous nitrogen formation ranged from -181 mV to -125 mV. Regulating cathode potential through varying the external resistance was feasible, achieving the optimal sulfur formation percent (32.4 +/- 1.9%) and gaseous nitrogen formation percent (92.5 +/- 0.3%) at a cathode potential of -139 +/- 37 mV. The potentiostatic three-chamber MFC is a suitable configuration for investigating the effect of electrode potential on pollutant conversion because its uncontrolled electrode could simulate the electron driving force situation occurring in a MFC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available