Journal
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING AND PROCESSING-PROCESS INTENSIFICATION
Volume 125, Issue -, Pages 318-324Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2017.11.015
Keywords
Photocatalytic membrane reactor; Ceramic membrane; Hydrogen peroxide; Secondary wastewater; Ecotoxicity; Thamnocephalus platyurus
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
A comparison of effectiveness of two advanced oxidation processes, photocatalysis and ultraviolet (UV) irradiation enhanced with H2O2 addition, coupled with ultrafiltration (UF) for treatment of secondary effluent (SE) from a municipal wastewater treatment plant (VVWTP) is presented. The results were compared with photolysis UF system. The concentration of H2O2 in the UV/H2O2 UF mode ranged from 0.03 to 0.3 g/L, the photocatalyst TiO2 P25 loading was changed from 0.5 to 2 g/L. A ceramic membrane with ZrO2 separation layer was used. No significant influence of photocatalyst or H202 concentration on permeate flux was observed, however, both PMR (photocatalytic membrane reactor) and UV/H2O2 UF systems were less prone to fouling than the photolysis UF one. Adsorption was found to be an important stage of total organic carbon (TOC) removal in PMR, while OF contributed mainly to photocatalyst rejection with minor effect on the overall treatment efficiency. The highest TOC removal of organic contaminants after 5 h of operation was found at 1.5 gTiO(2)/L in PMR (61%) and 0.15 gH(2)O(2)/L in UV/H2O2 UF process (65%). The quality of permeate obtained in both systems was comparable, the product of the latter one exhibited lower ecotoxicity towards crustaceans Thamnocephalus platyurus than the PMR permeate.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available