4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Synthesis, characterization, and application of ruthenium-doped SrTiO3 perovskite catalysts for microwave-assisted methane dry reforming

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2018.03.024

Keywords

Microwaves; Methane dry reforming; Perovskite catalysts; Dielectric properties measurements

Funding

  1. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme/ERC [267348]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) [267348] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of ruthenium-doped strontium titanate (SrTiO3) perovskite catalysts were synthesized by conventional and microwave-assisted hydrothermal methods. The structure was analyzed by X-Ray diffraction (XRD) confirming the formation of the perovskite phase with some TiO2 anatase phase in all the catalysts. Microwave irradiation decreases the temperature and time of synthesis from 220 degrees C for 24 h (conventional heating) to 180 degrees C for 1 h, without affecting the formation of perovskite. A 7 wt. % ruthenium-doped SrTiO3 catalyst showed the best dielectric properties, and thus its catalytic activity was evaluated for the methane dry reforming reaction under microwave heating in a custom fixed-bed quartz reactor. Microwave power, CH4:CO2 vol. % feed ratio and gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) were varied in order to determine the best conditions for performing dry reforming with high reactants conversions and H-2/CO ratio. Stable maximum CH4 and CO2 conversions of similar to 99.5% and similar to 94%, respectively, at H-2/CO similar to 0.9 were possible to reach with the 7 wt. % ruthenium-doped SrTiO3 catalyst exposed to maximum temperatures in the vicinity of 940 degrees C. A comparative theoretical scale-up study shows significant improvement in H-2 production capability in the case of the perovskite catalyst compared to carbon-based catalysts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available