4.7 Article

Synthesis of Mo-doped TiO2/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite for photoelectrocatalytic applications

Journal

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 44, Issue 11, Pages 13015-13023

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.04.120

Keywords

Milling; Nanocomposites; TiO2; Graphene

Funding

  1. University of Tabriz (Iran)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study was carried out with the goal of lowering the band gap and electron recombination of the titanium dioxide through doping with Mo, and hybridizing with reduced graphene oxide, respectively, for photoelectrocatalytic applications. Mo with various atomic percentages (0.5, 1, 2, and 3 at%) was doped with TiO2 using the mechanical alloying technique. The results of the ultraviolet diffuse reflectance spectroscopy analysis revealed that the TiO2 doped with 1 at% Mo possessed the lowest band gap energy. Also, to further improve the photoelectrocatalytic efficiency, the 1 at% Mo-doped TiO2 powder was hybridized with the reduced graphene oxide (RGO) through UV-assisted photocatalytic reduction of the graphene oxide. The XRD, FESEM, EDX, and FTIR analyses were implemented for characterization of the TiO2, 1 at% Mo-doped TiO2, and 1 at% Mo-doped TiO2/RGO powders. The superior integration of the TiO2 and RGO was achieved as a result of the photocatalytic reduction method. After coating the powders on the fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) glass using the doctor blade technique, linear sweep voltammetry, amperometry, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy tests were used to study the photoelectrocatalytic behavior of the samples. The results of the electrochemical tests showed that the photoelectrocatalytic activity of the TiO2 was significantly enhanced as doped with Mo, and hybridized with the RGO. The mechanisms affecting the photoelectrocatalytic response in the Mo-doped TiO2/RGO composite are discussed, as well.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available