4.7 Article

Vibrations of beam-type implants made of 3D printed bredigite-magnetite bio-nanocomposite scaffolds under axial compression: Application, communication and simulation

Journal

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 44, Issue 10, Pages 11282-11291

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.03.173

Keywords

Nanotechnology; Bio-nanocomposites; Nonlinear vibration; 3D printer design; Biomedical scaffold

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to the Si-O-Si bonding, silicate bioceramics have enhanced mechanical characteristics than their calcium phosphate (CaP) counterparts. Bredigite with orthorhombic crystal system is one of the most efficient bioceramics in osteoblast and bone growth. On the other hand, biosilicate-magnetite composites (e.g. bredigitemagnetite and hardystonite-magnetite) are excellent candidates for hyperthermia applications. In the current study, the vibrational response of a beam-type bone implant subjected to axial compression is investigated. The implant is made of bredigite-magnetite bio-nanocomposite scaffold fabricated by 3D printing machine including 0.8mm pore size. The Young's modulus of the scaffold is extracted experimentally corresponding to different magnetite nanoparticle (MNP) weight fractions, crystalline nanocomposite particle size, and various shapes of morphology. The morphology shape is determined corresponding to different MNP weight fractions and temperatures using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Thereafter, an analytical solution is presented to express explicitly the load-frequency and frequency-deflection responses of the axially loaded beam-type bone implant. It is observed that in the prebuckling domain, by increasing the axial compressive load, the influence of the MNP weight fraction on the natural frequency of the bio-nanocomposite implant increases while in the postbuckling regime, increment in the axial compression has no effect on the significance of the MNP weight fraction effect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available