4.7 Article

Cationic modification of ramie fibers in liquid ammonia

Journal

CELLULOSE
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages 4463-4475

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-018-1905-1

Keywords

Cationic modification; Ramie fiber; Liquid ammonia; Reactive dye

Funding

  1. China National Textile & Apparel Council (Textile Vision'' Applied Basic Research) [2013-153]
  2. Hubei Province Science and Technology Support Program [2013BAA043]
  3. Collaborative Innovation Plan of Hubei Province for Key Technology of Eco-Ramie Industry [2014-8]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anhydrous liquid ammonia was used as a solvent for the cationic modification of ramie fiber using 2, 3-epoxypropytrimethylammonium chloride (EPTAC). The processing parameters, including treatment temperature, treatment time, concentration of EPTAC, and concentration of NaOH were schematically investigated in order to control the properties of the fibers. The optimum parameters for cationic modification in liquid ammonia were analyzed through zeta potential measurement. The modified fibers were dyed in different conditions after modification, and the dyeing behaviors such as exhaustion and fixation properties were carefully examined. The modified fiber in liquid ammonia consisted of a higher number of cationic groups on the fibers compared to the fibers modified in water. The cationization reaction in liquid ammonia significantly decreased the crystallinity and the crystallite orientation of the resultant fibers. The decreased crystallinity slightly decreased the thermal resistance and tensile strength but increased the elongation ability of the fibers. The liquid ammonia cationic modification process turned the appearance of fibers from rough to smooth and lustrous due to swelling of fibers in the solvent. The exhaustion, fixation and wash fastness property of the fibers were improved after the cationic modification in liquid ammonia. [GRAPHICS]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available