4.2 Review

Prognostic Role of Pretreatment Plasma D-Dimer in Patients with Solid Tumors: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal

CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages 1663-1676

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000487734

Keywords

D-dimer; Solid tumors; Prognosis; Meta-analysis

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aims: Elevated pretreatment plasma D-dimer level has been reported as an unfavorable prognostic indicator in several malignancies. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the prognostic value of elevated D-dimer level in solid tumors. Methods: A comprehensive search of electronic databases up to June 10, 2017 was carried out by two independent reviewers. We included studies exploring the association between pretreatment plasma D-dimer level and patients' survival outcomes in solid tumors. Overall survival (OS) was regarded as primary outcome and progression-free survival (PFS), disease-free survival (DFS) as well as cancer-specific survival (CSS) were chosen as secondary outcomes. Hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) were extracted directly or indirectly from included studies. Results: 49 studies with 13001 patients were included in our meta-analysis. Elevated D-dimer was markedly associated with poor OS (pooled HR = 1.90, 95% CI = 1.63 - 2.20, P < 0.001). The effect was observed in all different tumor sites, disease stages, cut-off values and ethnicities. Meanwhile, patients with a high plasma D-dimer had a shorter PFS (HR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.22-1.76; P < 0.001), DFS (HR = 2.02, 95% CI = 1.56-2.62) and CSS (HR = 2.04, 95% CI= 1.58 2.64). Conclusions: Analysis of the pretreatment plasma D-dimer might provide useful information to predict prognosis in patients with solid tumors. (C) 2018 The Au thor(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available