4.7 Article

Transient inhibition of p53 homologs protects ovarian function from two distinct apoptotic pathways triggered by anticancer therapies

Journal

CELL DEATH AND DIFFERENTIATION
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages 502-515

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41418-018-0151-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health National Center for Translational Research in Reproduction and Infertility (NCTRI) [P50HD076188]
  2. Comprehensive Cancer Center
  3. Ohio State University [P30CA016058, R01CA154358, R01HD064402, R01NS089662]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Platinum-based chemotherapies can result in ovarian insufficiency by reducing the ovarian reserve, a reduction believed to result from apoptosis of immature oocytes via activation/phosphorylation of TAp63 alpha by multiple kinases including CHEK2, CK1, and ABL1. Here we demonstrate that cisplatin (CDDP) induces oocyte apoptosis through a novel pathway and that temporary repression of this pathway fully preserves ovarian function in vivo. Although ABL kinase inhibitors effectively block CDDP-induced apoptosis of oocytes, oocytic ABL1, and ABL2 are dispensable for damage-induced apoptosis. Instead, CDDP activates TAp63 alpha through the ATR > CHEK1 pathway independent of TAp63 alpha hyper-phosphorylation, whereas X-irradiation activates the ATM > CHEK2 > TAp63 alpha-hyper-phosphorylation pathway. Furthermore, oocyte-specific deletion of Trp73 partially protects oocytes from CDDP but not from X-ray, highlighting the fundamental differences of two pathways. Nevertheless, temporary repression of DNA damage response by a kinase inhibitor that attenuates phosphorylation of ATM, ATR, CHEK1, and CHEK2 fully preserves fertility in female mice against CDDP as well as X-ray. Our current study establishes the molecular basis and feasibility of adjuvant therapies to protect ovarian function against two distinctive gonadotoxic therapeutics, CDDP, and ionizing radiation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available