4.7 Article

Effects of topographic factors on runoff and soil loss in Southwest China

Journal

CATENA
Volume 160, Issue -, Pages 394-402

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2017.10.013

Keywords

Soil erosion; Slope gradient; Slope length; Field plot; Karst

Funding

  1. Guizhou Provincial Water Resources Department's project Soil erosion mechanism and soil erosion prediction research in karst area of Southwest China [2006200]
  2. National Natural Science Funds of China [41371045]
  3. Open Project Program of Chongqing Key Laboratory of Karst Environment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soil erosion is a threat to sustainable agricultural and regional development in karst regions. In this study, field plot observation method was used to estimate the effects of slope gradient and length on runoff and soil loss in Guizhou, Southwest China. The results showed that runoff and soil loss is nonlinearly related to slope gradient. The increasing trends of runoff and soil loss declined after the slope gradient of 15 degrees. This turning point was affected by both slope gradient and rock outcrops on the 20 degrees-25 degrees slopes, hence it is still unknown whether the slope gradient of 15 degrees is a critical value. Runoff showed a trend of decrease-increase-decrease as slope length increased, and soil loss rate showed an increasing trend as slope length increased. There is a significantly positive linear relationship between soil loss and slope length (P < 0.01). Runoff and soil loss were significantly correlated with rainfall amount (P) and the maximum 30 or 60 min rainfall intensity (I-30 or I-60), which had power function with PI30 on gradient-changed slopes and PI60 on length-changed slopes. Moreover, soil loss has a power function relationship with slope gradient/length and runoff depth. This study is helpful to elucidate the effect of topographic factors on soil erosion and to take effective soil conservation measures in karst regions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available