4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Sulfonated biochar as acid catalyst for sugar hydrolysis and dehydration

Journal

CATALYSIS TODAY
Volume 314, Issue -, Pages 52-61

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2018.02.034

Keywords

Engineered biochar; Biomass valorization; Hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF); Fructose dehydration; Polysaccharide hydrolysis; Waste recycling

Funding

  1. Hong Kong International Airport Environmental Fund [K-ZJKC]
  2. Hong Kong Environment and Conservation Fund [K-ZB78]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the use of 30 w/v% H2SO4 sulfonated wood waste-derived biochar as catalysts for production of value-added chemicals from carbohydrates in water as an environmentally benign solvent. Physicochemical characteristics of the sulfonated biochar were revealed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), acid-base neutralization titration, gas adsorption analysis, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX). Using the sulfonated biochar as catalysts, hydrolysis of maltose at 140-160 degrees C resulted in the maximum glucose yield of 85.4% and selectivity of 88.2%, whereas dehydration of fructose at 160-180 degrees C produced the maximum HMF yield of 42.3% and selectivity of 60.4%. A higher range of reaction temperature was required for fructose dehydration due to the higher energy barrier compared to maltose hydrolysis. While increasing the temperature accelerated the catalytic reactions, the maximum product selectivity remained unchanged in the sulfonated biochar-catalyzed systems. The products were stable despite the increase in reaction time, because rehydration and adsorption of products was found to be minor although polymerization of intermediates led to unavoidable carbon loss. This study highlights the efficacy of engineered biochars in biorefinery as an emerging application.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available