4.0 Article

DMD mutation and LTBP4 haplotype do not predict onset of left ventricular dysfunction in Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Journal

CARDIOLOGY IN THE YOUNG
Volume 28, Issue 7, Pages 910-915

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1047951118000288

Keywords

Duchenne muscular dystrophy; left ventricular dysfunction; genotype; dystrophin; modifier genes; steroid therapy

Funding

  1. University of Utah Study Design and Biostatistics Center
  2. National Center for Research Resources
  3. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health [8UL1TR000105]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cardiomyopathy develops in > 90% of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) patients by the second decade of life. We assessed the associations between DMD gene mutations, as well as Latent transforming growth factor-beta-binding protein 4 (LTBP4) haplotypes, and age at onset of myocardial dysfunction in DMD. DMD patients with baseline normal left ventricular systolic function and genotyping between 2004 and 2013 were included. Patients were grouped in multiple ways: specific DMD mutation domains, true loss-of-function mutations (group A) versus possible residual gene expression (group B), and LTBP4 haplotype. Age at onset of myocardial dysfunction was the first echocardiogram with an ejection fraction <55% and/or shortening fraction <28%. Of 101 DMD patients, 40 developed cardiomyopathy. There was no difference in age at onset of myocardial dysfunction among DMD genotype mutation domains (13.7 +/- 4.8 versus 14.3 +/- 1.0 versus 14.3 +/- 2.9 versus 13.8 +/- 2.5, p=0.97), groups A and B (14.4 +/- 2.8 versus 12.1 +/- 4.4, p=0.09), or LTBP4 haplotypes (14.5 +/- 3.2 versus 13.1 +/- 3.2 versus 11.0 +/- 2.8, p=0.18). DMD gene mutations involving the hinge 3 region, actin-binding domain, and exons 45-49, as well as the LTBP4 IAAM haplotype, were not associated with age of left ventricular dysfunction onset in DMD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available