4.8 Article

Carbon nanotube@manganese oxide nanosheet core-shell structure encapsulated within reduced graphene oxide film for flexible all-solid-state asymmetric supercapacitors

Journal

CARBON
Volume 132, Issue -, Pages 776-784

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.12.051

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Development Fund of the Macau SAR [FDCT-098/2015/A3]
  2. Research & Development Office at the University of Macau [MYRG2017-00216-FST]
  3. UEA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To achieve flexible energy storage devices with high performance, a new class of flexible electrodes with exquisite architectures that provide well-defined pathways for efficient ionic and electronic transport is highly needed. A flexible 3D electrode is fabricated based on assembling 1D carbon nanotube@manganese oxide (MnO2) nanosheet core-shell structures (CM) with 2D reduced graphene oxide (rGO) nanosheets. MnO2 nanosheets are grafted vertically along the carbon nanotube backbone through a secondary (seeded) growth. Flexible hybrid films (GCM) composed of CM and rGO are prepared by vacuum filtration of the mixed dispersions of both components assisted by electrostatic interactions. By adopting this ternary hybrid architecture, the GCM electrode exhibits exceptional charge storage capability in 1 M Na2SO4 aqueous electrolyte with high specific capacitance (298 F g(-1) at 0.5 A g(-1)), good rate capability, and high cycling stability (90.3% retention over 5000 cycles). A highly flexible all-solid-state asymmetrical supercapacitor is assembled with GCM as the positive electrode and holey graphene film spaced with carbon sphere (H-GCS) as the negative electrode. GCM//H-GCS asymmetric supercapacitor delivers a maximum energy density of 24.6 Wh kg(-1) and a power density of 9005.3 W kg(-1) with excellent cycle life of 75.9% retention after 10 000 cycles. (c) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available