4.8 Article

In-situ thermal stability analysis of amorphous carbon films with different sp(3) content

Journal

CARBON
Volume 130, Issue -, Pages 401-409

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.01.034

Keywords

DLC; Thermal stability; Raman spectroscopy; Nanoindentation; Surface roughness

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 105-2811-E-194-007, 105-2221-E-194 -029 -MY3]
  2. AFOSR [FA4869-06-1-0056 AOARD 064053]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A synchronized system integrating Raman spectroscopy and depth-sensing techniques was applied to analyze the microstructure, mechanical properties and surface roughness of amorphous carbon (a-C) films in-situ. This integrated system equipped with a high-temperature chamber coupled with feedback control made it possible to study the temperature effects on the mechanical properties and the microstructure of the films. A series of a-C films with different sp(3) content were deposited on Si substrates using a filtered cathodic arc vacuum (FCVA) deposition system. Our study confirms previous results that the thermal stability of the a-C films depends on their sp(3) content. The results also show that the structural change is accompanied by a significant increase in the surface roughness. This synchronized characterization technique demonstrates that the film hardness decreases with temperature even before any chemical changes detected using Raman spectroscopy. Moreover, the surface of the films is more sensitive to the temperature compared to the bulk as evidenced by the surface roughness characterization, showing that the surface roughness starts to rise at temperatures lower than for the onset of structural transition in the bulk. Nanoscratch and nanowear tests further support the conclusion that the surface sensitivity to temperature is greater than for the bulk. (c) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available