4.8 Article

Ultrahigh level nitrogen/sulfur co-doped carbon as high performance anode materials for lithium-ion batteries

Journal

CARBON
Volume 126, Issue -, Pages 85-92

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.09.100

Keywords

Electrode materials; Co-doping; Porous carbon; Anode; Lithium

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51673117]
  2. National High-tech RD Program (863) [2015AA03A204]
  3. Science and Technology Innovation Commission of Shenzhen [JCYJ20140418091413553, JCYJ20150625 102750478, JCYJ20150529164656097, JSGG20160226201833 790, JCYJ20160520163535684, JCYJ20160422144936457]
  4. Foundation for Distinguished Young Talents in Higher Education of Guangdong, China [2013LYM_0080]
  5. Special Program for Applied Research on Super Computation of the NSFC-Guangdong Joint Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ultrahigh level nitrogen and sulfur co-doped disordered porous carbon (NSDPC) was facilely synthesized and applied as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). Benefiting from high nitrogen (14.0 wt%) and sulfur (21.1 wt%) doping, electrode fabricated from NS1/3 showed a high reversible capacity of 1188 mA h g(-1) at 0.1 A g(-1) in the first cycle with a high initial columbic efficiency (> 75%). In addition, prolonged life over 500 cycles and excellent rate capability of 463 mA h g(-1) at 5 A g(-1) have been realized. The preeminent electrochemical performance is attributed to three effects: (1) the high level of sulfur and nitrogen; (2) the synergic effect of dual-doping heteroatoms in cooperation with each other; (3) the large quantity of edge defects and abundant micropores and mesopores that can provide extra Li storage regions. These unique features of NSDPC electrodes suggest that they can serve as a practical substitute for graphite as a high performance anode material in LIBs. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available