4.6 Review

Immunotherapy in head and neck cancers: A new challenge for immunologists, pathologists and clinicians

Journal

CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS
Volume 65, Issue -, Pages 54-64

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.02.008

Keywords

Head and neck cancer; Nasopharynx cancer; Immunotherapy; PD-L1; Immune checkpoint; HPV; EBV

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cancer occurrence can be understood as the result of dysfunctions in immune tumoral microenvironment. Here we review the recent understandings of those microenvironment changes, regarding their causes and prognostic significance in head and neck (HN) carcinoma. We will focus on HN squamous cell cancer (SCC) and nasopharyngeal carcinomas (NPC). Their overall poor prognosis may be improved with immunotherapy in a subset of patients, as supported by current clinical trials. However, finding reliable markers of therapeutic response is crucial for patient selection, due to potential severe adverse reactions and high costs. Half of HNSCC exhibit PD-L1 expression, this expression being higher in HPV-positive tumors. In recent clinical trials, a better therapeutic response to anti-PD-1 was obtained in patients with higher PD-L1 expression. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the use of these therapeutics without stating a need for patient selection regarding PD-L1 status. Activation status, density and localization of TIL as well as PD-L2, gamma-interferon, inflammatory cytokines, epithelial-mesenchymal transition phenotype and mutational burden may all be potential therapeutic response markers. In Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV)-induced nasopharyngeal non-keratinizing cancer, PD-L1 is over-expressed compared to EBV-negative tumors. A 22% response rate has been observed under anti-PD-1 treatment among PD-L1 positive NPC patients. A better understanding of immune checkpoint regulation processes may allow patients to benefit from these promising immunotherapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available