4.6 Review

The poor design of clinical trials of statins in oncology may explain their failure - Lessons for drug repurposing

Journal

CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS
Volume 69, Issue -, Pages 84-89

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.06.010

Keywords

Statins; Clinical trial design; Drug repurposing

Categories

Funding

  1. Keele University
  2. Higher Committee for Education Development in Iraq [D-11-296]
  3. Iraqi Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research [S1844]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Statins are widely used to treat hypercholesterolaemia. However, by inhibiting the production of mevalonate, they also reduce the production of several isoprenoids that are necessary for the function of small GTPase oncogenes such as Ras. As such, statins offer an attractive way to inhibit an undruggable target, suggesting that they may be usefully repurposed to treat cancer. However, despite numerous studies, there is still no consensus whether statins are useful in the oncology arena. Numerous preclinical studies have provided evidence justifying the evaluation of statins in cancer patients. Some retrospective studies of patients taking statins to control cholesterol have identified a reduced risk of cancer mortality. However, prospective clinical studies have mostly not been successful. We believe that this has occurred because many of the prospective clinical trials have been poorly designed. Many of these trials have failed to take into account some or all of the factors identified in preclinical studies that are likely to be necessary for statins to be efficacious. We suggest an improved trial design which takes these factors into account. Importantly, we suggest that the design of clinical trials of drugs which are being considered for repurposing should not assume it is appropriate to use them in the same way as they are used in their original indication. Rather, such trials deserve to be informed by preclinical studies that are comparable to those for any novel drug.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available