4.8 Article

PHF5A Epigenetically Inhibits Apoptosis to Promote Breast Cancer Progression

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 78, Issue 12, Pages 3190-3206

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-3514

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China (National Key R&D Program of China) [MOST2016YFC0900300]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81572583, 81672601]
  3. Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology Funds [15410724000]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Alternative splicing (AS) and its regulation play critical roles in cancer, yet the dysregulation of AS and its molecular bases in breast cancer development have not yet been elucidated. Using an in vivo CRISPR screen targeting RNA-binding proteins, we identified PHD finger protein 5A (PHF5A) as a key splicing factor involved in tumor progression. PHF5A expression was frequently upregulated in breast cancer and correlated with poor survival, and knockdown of PHF5A significantly suppressed cell proliferation, migration, and tumor formation. PHF5A was required For SF3b Spliceosome stability and linked the complex to histones, and the PHF5A-SF3b complex modulated AS changes in apoptoticsignaling. In addition, expression of a short truncated FAS-activated serine/threonine kinase (FASTK) protein was increased after PHF5A ablation and facilitated has-mediated apoptosis. This PHF5A-modulated FASTK-AS axis was widely present in breast cancer specimens, particularly those of the triple-negative subtype. Taken together, our findings reveal that PHF5A serves as an epigenetic suppressor of apoptosis and thus provides a mechanistic basis for breast cancer progression and may be a valuable therapeutic target. Significance: This study provides an epigenetic mechanistic basis for the aggressive biology of breast cancer and identifies translatable therapeutic target. (C)2018 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available