4.7 Article

Identification of a novel autophagic inhibitor cepharanthine to enhance the anti-cancer property of dacomitinib in non-small cell lung cancer

Journal

CANCER LETTERS
Volume 412, Issue -, Pages 1-9

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.10.001

Keywords

Cepharanthine; Autophagy; Lysosome; Dacomitinib; NSCLC

Categories

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Development Fund, Macao S.A.R (FDCT) [024/2016/A1]
  2. Research Fund of University of Macau [MYRG2015-00091-ICMS-QRCM, MYRG2015-00101-ICMS-QRCM]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Inhibition of autophagy is a promising strategy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment, which is in the clinical trials. However, only chloroquine is used in clinic as an autophagic inhibitor and the inhibitory effect of chloroquine on autophagy is finite. Therefore, the development of an alternative autophagic inhibitor for NSCLC therapy becomes necessary. In the present study, cepharanthine (CEP), an alkaloid extracted from Stephania cepharantha Hayata, was identified as a novel autophagic inhibitor in NSCLC cells. The potential mechanism of the CEP-inhibited autophagy was by blockage of autophagosome-lysosome fusion and inhibition of lysosomal cathepsin B and cathepsin D maturation. Furthermore, we found for the first time that dacomitinib (DAC), a second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor that in the phase III clinical trials for NSCLC treatment, induced a protective autophagy to decrease its anti-cancer effect. Combined treatment with CEP increased the anti proliferative and apoptotic effects of DAC in vitro and enhanced the anti-cancer effect of DAC in NCI H1975 xenograft mice. Collectively, CEP might be further developed as an autophagic inhibitor, and combined treatment of CEP and DAC could offer an effective strategy for NSCLC treatment. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available