4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Stomach content and stable isotope analysis of sailfish (Istiophorus platypterus) diet in eastern Taiwan waters

Journal

FISHERIES RESEARCH
Volume 166, Issue -, Pages 39-46

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2014.10.021

Keywords

Istiophorid; Opportunistic predator; Stomach contents; Stable isotopes; Stable-isotope mixing model

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Council of Taiwan [NSC 101-2611-M-056-001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stomach content analysis (SCA) and stable isotope analysis (SIA), coupled with isotopic-mixing model analysis, were used to estimate diet composition of sailfish Istiophorus platypterus in eastern Taiwan waters. SCA provided information on diet, but the high occurrence of empty stomachs (48.5%) limited this analysis. According to the index of relative importance (%IRI), the most important prey items were Priacanthus macracanthus (38.7%), followed by Auxis spp. (35.9%), and Trichfurus lepturus (8.5%). However, the most important prey groups for adult sailfish (>181 cm, LJFL) as estimated by the stable isotope-mixing model were T. lepturus (32.6%),Katsuwonus pelamis (15.8%), and P. macracanthus (11.3%), and for maturing sailfish were K. pelamis (12.9%), P. macracanthus (10.4%), and T. lepturus (32.6%), respectively. Juvenile sailfish feed primarily on smaller prey items with lower 615N values, while adult sailfish preferred larger prey items with higher 815N values. Our findings suggested that an integrated SCA and SIA is considerably more powerful than using SCA alone in determining diet composition of sailfish over long time scales. In summary, a high diversity in the diet composition of sailfish was found and included an array of coastal, benthic, pelagic, and mesopelagic species. Sailfish are most likely opportunistic feeders consuming the most abundant prey items in eastern Taiwan waters. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available