4.8 Article

Targeting the Senescence-Overriding Cooperative Activity of Structurally Unrelated H3K9 Demethylases in Melanoma

Journal

CANCER CELL
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages 322-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.01.002

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [TRR 54]
  2. German Cancer Consortium (Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung [DKTK])
  3. Wilhelm Sander Foundation [2015.016.1]
  4. NIH [CA103846]
  5. Ellison Foundation
  6. Chinese Scholarship Council
  7. Berlin School of Integrative Oncology (BSIO)
  8. ERC [StG-335377]
  9. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP-133442]
  10. BBSRC [BB/M003760/1, BB/N000323/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. MRC [MC_U120085811] Funding Source: UKRI
  12. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/M003760/1, BB/N000323/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  13. Medical Research Council [MC_U120085811] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oncogene-induced senescence, e.g., in melanocytic nevi, terminates the expansion of pre-malignant cells via transcriptional silencing of proliferation-related genes due to decoration of their promoters with repressive trimethylated histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9) marks. We show here that structurally distinct H3K9-active demethylases-the lysine-specific demethylase-1 (LSD1) and several Jumonji C domain-containing moieties (such as JMJD2C)-disable senescence and permit Ras/Braf-evoked transformation. In mouse and zebrafish models, enforced LSD1 or JMJD2C expression promoted Braf-V600E-driven melanomagenesis. A large subset of established melanoma cell lines and primary human melanoma samples presented with a collective upregulation of related and unrelated H3K9 demethylase activities, whose targeted inhibition restored senescence, even in Braf inhibitor-resistant melanomas, evoked secondary immune effects and controlled tumor growth in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available