4.3 Editorial Material

Social factors matter in cancer risk and survivorship

Journal

CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
Volume 29, Issue 7, Pages 611-618

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-018-1043-y

Keywords

United States; Breast cancer; Social determinants; Race/ethnicity; Disparities

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health
  2. National Cancer Institute [K01-CA184288, U54-CA155850, U01-CA116850, U54-CA155496, P30-CA006973]
  3. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (Johns Hopkins University Center for AIDS Research) [P30-AI094189]
  4. National Institute of Mental Health [R25-MH083620]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Greater attention to social factors, such as race/ethnicity, socioeconomic position, and others, are needed across the cancer continuum, including breast cancer, given differences in tumor biology and genetic variants have not completely explained the persistent Black/White breast cancer mortality disparity. In this commentary, we use examples in breast cancer risk assessment and survivorship to demonstrate how the failure to appropriately incorporate social factors into the design, recruitment, and analysis of research studies has resulted in missed opportunities to reduce persistent cancer disparities. The conclusion offers recommendations for how to better document and use information on social factors in cancer research and care by (1) increasing education and awareness about the importance of inclusion of social factors in clinical research; (2) improving testing and documentation of social factors by incorporating them into journal guidelines and reporting stratified results; and (3) including social factors to refine extant tools that assess cancer risk and assign cancer care. Implementing the recommended changes would enable more effective design and implementation of interventions and work toward eliminating cancer disparities by accounting for the social and environmental contexts in which cancer patients live and are treated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available