4.4 Review

Maternal vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy

Journal

BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN
Volume 126, Issue 1, Pages 57-77

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldy010

Keywords

vitamin D; pregnancy; offspring; obstetric; bone; epidemiology

Funding

  1. European Union [289346, 613977]
  2. BBSRC [BB/P028179/1]
  3. MRC [MC_UU_12011/2, MC_UP_A620_1015, MC_U147585819, MC_U147585827, G0400491] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Maternal vitamin D status in pregnancy has been linked to many health outcomes in mother and offspring. A wealth of observational studies have reported on both obstetric outcomes and complications, including pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes, mode and timing of delivery. Many foetal and childhood outcomes are also linked to vitamin D status, including measures of foetal size, body composition and skeletal mineralization, in addition to later childhood outcomes, such as asthma. Sources of data: Synthesis of systematic and narrative reviews. Areas of agreement and controversy: The findings are generally inconsistent in most areas, and, at present, there is a lack of data from high-quality intervention studies to confirm a causal role for vitamin D in these outcomes. In most areas, the evidence tends towards maternal vitamin D being of overall benefit, but often does not reach statistical significance in meta-analyses. Growing points and areas timely for developing research: The most conclusive evidence is in the role of maternal vitamin D supplementation in the prevention of neonatal hypocalcaemia; as a consequence the UK department of health recommends that pregnant women take 400 IU vitamin D daily. High-quality randomized placebo-controlled trials, such as the UK-based MAVIDOS trial, will inform the potential efficacy and safety of vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy across a variety of outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available