4.6 Article

Prolonged exposure therapy and supportive counselling for post-traumatic stress disorder in adolescents: task-shifting randomised controlled trial

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
Volume 213, Issue 4, Pages 587-594

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2018.130

Keywords

Cognitive-behavioural therapies; low- and middle-income countries; post-traumatic stress disorder; randomised controlled trial; task-shifting; treatment outcome

Categories

Funding

  1. Stellenbosch University Rural Medical Education Partnership Initiative (SURMEPI)
  2. South African Research Chair Initiative in PTSD
  3. Department of Science and Technology
  4. National Research Foundation
  5. Harry Crossley Fund
  6. Ithemba Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Empirical evidence on the effectiveness of evidence-based treatments for adolescents with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in low-resource settings is needed. Aims To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of prolonged exposure and supportive counselling in adolescents with PTSD. Method Sixty-three adolescents (13-18 years) with PTSD were randomly assigned to receive either of the interventions comprising 7-14 sessions of treatment (trial registration in the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry: PACTR201511001345372). The primary outcome measure was PTSD symptom severity, as independently assessed on the Child PTSD Symptom Scale at pre-treatment, post-treatment, and at 3- and 6-month follow-up. Results Participants receiving prolonged exposure experienced greater improvement on the PTSD symptom severity scale than those receiving supportive counselling (between group differences at post-intervention, mean 12.49, 95% CI 6.82-18.17, P<0.001; d =1.22). A similar effect size was maintained at 3-month (d = 0.85) and 6-month (d = 1.02) follow-up assessments. Conclusions Adolescents with PTSD experienced greater benefit from prolonged exposure treatment when provided by non-specialist health workers (nurses) in a community setting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available