4.4 Article

A carbohydrate-reduced high-protein diet acutely decreases postprandial and diurnal glucose excursions in type 2 diabetes patients

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 119, Issue 8, Pages 910-917

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114518000521

Keywords

Diabetes; Carbohydrates; Postprandial glucose

Funding

  1. Danish Dairy Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of the study was to assess whether a simple substitution of carbohydrate in the conventionally recommended diet with protein and fat would result in a clinically meaningful reduction in postprandial hyperglycaemia in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In all, sixteen subjects with T2DM treated with metformin only, fourteen male, with a median age of 65 (43-70) years, HbA(1c) of 6.5 % (47 mmol/l) (5.5-8.3 % (37-67 mmol/l)) and a BMI of 30 (sd 4.4) kg/m(2) participated in the randomised, cross-over study. A carbohydrate-reduced high-protein (CRHP) diet was compared with an iso-energetic conventional diabetes (CD) diet. Macronutrient contents of the CRHP/CD diets consisted of 31/54 % energy from carbohydrate, 29/16 % energy from protein and 40/30 % energy from fat, respectively. Each diet was consumed on 2 consecutive days in a randomised order. Postprandial glycaemia, pancreatic and gut hormones, as well as satiety, were evaluated at breakfast and lunch. Compared with the CD diet, the CRHP diet reduced postprandial AUC of glucose by 14 %, insulin by 22 % and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide by 17 % (all P < 0.001), respectively. Correspondingly, glucagon AUC increased by 33 % (P < 0.001), cholecystokinin by 24 % (P = 0.004) and satiety scores by 7 % (P = 0.035), respectively. A moderate reduction in carbohydrate with an increase in fat and protein in the diet, compared with an energy-matched CD diet, greatly reduced postprandial glucose excursions and resulted in increased satiety in patients with well-controlled T2DM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available