4.6 Article

Romiplostim for the management of perioperative thrombocytopenia

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 182, Issue 1, Pages 106-113

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.15280

Keywords

thrombocytopenia; romiplostim; surgery; thrombopoietin receptor agonist; bleeding; perioperative

Categories

Funding

  1. Protalex
  2. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  3. Rigel
  4. Amgen
  5. CRICO

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thrombocytopenic patients requiring invasive surgery have few options to improve their platelet count preoperatively. This is a single-centre, retrospective review of thrombocytopenic patients receiving the thrombopoietin receptor agonist romiplostim perioperatively to allow for surgical interventions. Patient characteristics, romiplostim use, and surgical and safety outcomes (bleeding, thrombosis, transfusions) were collected and analysed. Forty-seven patients underwent 51 surgical procedures (ranging from total hip arthroplasty to open cardiac surgery) with romiplostim support. Thrombocytopenia aetiologies included immune thrombocytopenia, chronic liver disease, haematological malignancy, drug-related thrombocytopenia, and hereditary thrombocytopenia. Median (range) platelet counts improved, from 47x10(9)/l (9-120x10(9)/l) at romiplostim initiation to 164x10(9)/l (28-603x10(9)/l) at the time of surgery (P<00001). A dose of 3g/kg per week for 2 doses increased the platelet count to >100x10(9)/l in 79% of patients within 14days. In 96% of cases, surgery proceeded on schedule without delay or cancellation. Four patients had bleeding events unrelated to thrombocytopenia and 1 patient developed deep venous thrombosis. Six patients required red cell transfusion and 3 patients required platelet transfusion perioperatively. In conclusion, romiplostim was effective in increasing platelet counts to allow surgery to proceed safely and on schedule. Bleeding and thromboembolic events were within acceptable limits for this surgical population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available