4.6 Article

Efficacy and safety of the Janus kinase 1 inhibitor PF-04965842 in patients with moderate-to-serve psoriasis: phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 179, Issue 1, Pages 54-62

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.16004

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Pfizer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background PF-04965842 is an oral Janus kinase 1 inhibitor being investigated for the treatment of plaque psoriasis. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of PF-04965842 in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Methods Patients in this phase II , placebo-controlled study (NCT02201524) were randomized to receive placebo, 200 mg once daily (OD), 400 mg OD or 200 mg twice daily (TD) PF-04965842 for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) at week 4. Study enrolment was discontinued on 25 June 2015 due to changes in the sponsor's development priorities. Results Fifty-nine patients were randomized and received at least one dose of PF-04965842 or placebo. The estimated treatment effect (active -placebo PASI change from baseline) and 90% confidence interval at week 4 was -5.1 (-9.2 to -1.0), -5.6 (-9.6 to -1.6) and -10.0 (-14.2 to -5.8) for the 200 mg OD, 400 mg OD and 200 mg TD groups, respectively. At week 4, the proportion of patients achieving PASI 75 was 17% for the placebo and 200 mg TD group. There were more abnormal laboratory test results of clinical interest (low neutrophil, reticulocyte and platelet counts) in the 200 mg TD group compared with the OD treatment groups. No serious infections or bleeding events related to neutropenia or thrombocytopenia, respectively, were reported. Conclusions These results suggest that treatment with PF-04965842 improves symptoms and is well tolerated in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available