4.1 Article

Study of the Immunophenotype of the Inflammatory Cells in Melanomas With Regression and Halo Nevi

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOPATHOLOGY
Volume 37, Issue 5, Pages 376-380

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/DAD.0000000000000205

Keywords

melanoma; halo nevus; regression; PD1

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The pathogenesis and prognostic implications of regression in melanoma are not well understood. It has traditionally been considered an immunologically mediated phenomenon. Improvement in the knowledge of the mechanisms that lead to regression may prove to be of great value in an era in which treatments oriented to the augmentation of the host's immunity against melanoma have demonstrated excellent clinical results. This study was designed to improve the understanding of the mechanisms underlying melanoma regression and the differences between similar situations in benign melanocytic nevus. The study sample consisted of 77 lesions: 62 melanomas and 15 halo nevi. The following markers were included in the study: CD4, CD8, FoxP3, PD1, CD123, granzyme, and TIA-1. Staining was evaluated in 5 categories, according to the percentage of labeled cells. Granzyme, PD1, and TIA-1 stained significantly more cells in halo nevi than in melanomas with regression (P < 0.01). The ratio CD123/TIA-1 was higher in melanomas than in halo nevi (1 vs. 0.67, P < 0.05). Regression in the 62 melanomas was categorized as early in 14 cases and late in 48 cases. Early regression was associated with a higher percentage of CD123, CD4, and TIA-1 staining than late regression. The inflammatory infiltrate found in halo nevi is characterized by a higher number of active cytotoxic T cells and regulatory PD1-positive T cells than the infiltrate found in melanoma with regression. CD123 staining was higher in early regression than in late regression, suggesting the presence of a tolerogenic mechanism in this phenomenon's initiation phase.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available