4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Dreaming and awareness during dexmedetomidine- and propofol-induced unresponsiveness

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
Volume 121, Issue 1, Pages 260-269

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.03.014

Keywords

awareness; consciousness; dexmedetomidine; interview; propofol

Categories

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland, Helsinki, Finland [266467, 266434]
  2. Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation, Helsinki, Finland
  3. VSSHP-EVO, Turku, Finland [13323]
  4. Doctoral Programme of Clinical Investigation, University of Turku Graduate School, Turku, Finland
  5. Finnish Medical Foundation, Helsinki, Finland
  6. Emil Aaltonen Foundation, Tampere, Finland
  7. Paulo Foundation, Espoo, Finland
  8. Finnish Society of Anaesthesiologists
  9. Signe and Ane Gyllenberg Foundation
  10. Academy of Finland (AKA) [266467, 266467] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Experiences during anaesthetic-induced unresponsiveness have previously been investigated by interviews after recovery. To explore whether experiences occur during drug administration, we interviewed participants during target-controlled infusion (TCI) of dexmedetomidine or propofol and after recovery. Methods: Healthy participants received dexmedetomidine (n = 23) or propofol (n = 24) in stepwise increments until loss of responsiveness (LOR1). During TCI we attempted to arouse them for interview (return of responsiveness, ROR1). After the interview, if unresponsiveness ensued with the same dose (LOR2), the procedure was repeated (ROR2). Finally, the concentration was increased 1.5-fold to achieve presumable loss of consciousness (LOC), infusion terminated, and the participants interviewed upon recovery (ROR3). An emotional sound stimulus was presented during LORs and LOC, and memory for stimuli was assessed with recognition task after recovery. Interview transcripts were content analysed. Results: Of participants receiving dexmedetomidine, 18/23 were arousable from LOR1 and LOR2. Of participants receiving propofol, 10/24 were arousable from LOR1 and two of four were arousable from LOR2. Of 93 interviews performed, 84% included experiences from periods of unresponsiveness (dexmedetomidine 90%, propofol 74%). Internally generated experiences (dreaming) were present in 86% of reports from unresponsive periods, while externally generated experiences (awareness) were rare and linked to brief arousals. No within drug differences in the prevalence or content of experiences during infusion vs after recovery were observed, but participants receiving dexmedetomidine reported dreaming and awareness more often. Participants receiving dexmedetomidine recognised the emotional sounds better than participants receiving propofol (42% vs 15%), but none reported references to sounds spontaneously. Conclusion: Anaesthetic-induced unresponsiveness does not induce unconsciousness or necessarily even disconnectedness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available