4.6 Article

Ultrasound-tagged near-infrared spectroscopy does not disclose absent cerebral circulation in brain-dead adults

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
Volume 121, Issue 3, Pages 588-594

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.04.038

Keywords

brain death; brain monitoring; cerebral blood flow; near-infrared spectroscopy; ultrasound-tagged near-infrared spectroscopy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Near-infrared spectroscopy, a non-invasive technique for monitoring cerebral oxygenation, is widely used, but its accuracy is questioned because of the possibility of extra-cranial contamination. Ultrasound-tagged near-infrared spectroscopy (UT-NIRS) has been proposed as an improvement over previous methods. We investigated UT-NIRS in healthy volunteers and in brain-dead patients. Methods: We studied 20 healthy volunteers and 20 brain-dead patients with two UT-NIRS devices, CerOx (TM) and c-FLOW (TM) (Ornim Medical, Kfar Saba, Israel), which measure cerebral flow index (CFI), a parameter related to changes in cerebral blood flow (CBF). Monitoring started after the patients had been declared brain dead for a median of 34 (range: 11-300) min. In 11 cases, we obtained further demonstration of absent CBF. Results: In healthy volunteers, CFI was markedly different in the two hemispheres in the same subject, with wide variability amongst subjects. In brain-dead patients (median age: 64 yr old, 45% female; 20% traumatic brain injury, 40% subarachnoid haemorrhage, and 40% intracranial haemorrhage), the median (inter-quartile range) CFI was 41 (36-47), significantly higher than in volunteers (33; 27-36). Conclusions: In brain-dead patients, where CBF is absent, the UT-NIRS findings can indicate an apparently perfused brain. This might reflect an insufficient separation of signals from extra-cranial structures from a genuine appraisal of cerebral perfusion. For non-invasive assessment of CBF-related parameters, the near-infrared spectroscopy still needs substantial improvement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available