Journal
BRITISH JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Volume 71, Issue 1, Pages 259-286Publisher
UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bjps/axx028
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Philip Leverhulme Prize from the Leverhulme Trust
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Various results show the 'formal equivalence' of kin and group selectionist methodologies, but this does not preclude there being a real and useful distinction between kin and group selection processes. I distinguish individual- and population-centred approaches to drawing such a distinction, and I proceed to develop the latter. On the account I advance, the differences between kin and group selection are differences of degree in the structural properties of populations. A spatial metaphor ('K-G space') provides a useful framework for thinking about these differences: kin and group selection may be conceptualized as large, overlapping regions of K-G space. I then consider some implications of the account, defend it from possible objections, and further argue that the structural features characteristic of both kin and group selection may recur at multiple levels of biological organization.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available