4.7 Review

Interpretation of differential gene expression results of RNA-seq data: review and integration

Journal

BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages 2044-2054

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bby067

Keywords

differential gene expression analysis; differentially expressed genes; bioinformatics tools; visualization and interpretation; R/Bioconductor package

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation/EPSCoR Cooperative Agreement [IIA-1355423]
  2. State of South Dakota
  3. Institutional Development Award (IDeA) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [5P20GM121341]
  4. Sanford Health-SDSU Collaborative Research Seed Grant Program
  5. National Science Foundation [ACI-1548562]
  6. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [SD00H558-15, 1008151]
  7. National Nature Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61772313, 61432010]
  8. Young Scholars Program of Shandong University (YSPSDU) [2015WLJH19]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Differential gene expression (DGE) analysis is one of the most common applications of RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) data. This process allows for the elucidation of differentially expressed genes across two or more conditions and is widely used in many applications of RNA-seq data analysis. Interpretation of the DGE results can be nonintuitive and time consuming due to the variety of formats based on the tool of choice and the numerous pieces of information provided in these results files. Here we reviewed DGE results analysis from a functional point of view for various visualizations. We also provide an R/Bioconductor package, Visualization of Differential Gene Expression Results using R, which generates information-rich visualizations for the interpretation of DGE results from three widely used tools, Cuffdiff, DESeq2 and edgeR. The implemented functions are also tested on five real-world data sets, consisting of one human, one Malus domestica and three Vitis riparia data sets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available